, 2015; Cardoso and you can Souza, 2016; Santiago and you will Saliba, 2016; 2 Santos and you can Jalalzai, 2021). Within works we’re going to work on misogyny as the recognized by the interviewees in the context of Rousseff’s 6 decades in the electricity, particularly concentrating on the relationship ranging from misogynistic backlash therefore the gendered double bind fictional character identified. Regarding the pursuing the part we offer an even more nuanced meaning for each one of the subcategories identified (come across Desk dos), bringing remain-alone definitions and you will examples regarding the research in addition to descriptive analyses from trick minutes when you look at the Rousseff’s presidency you to exemplify the active ranging from the nuanced offer for examining the new gendered twice bind, misogynist backlash, and its own issues toward Rousseff’s presidency.
The brand new four subcategories understood appeared in the details at the different levels (find Dining tables step 3, 4). A couple of templates appeared in high ratio: Testing in order to Men and you may Misogynyments themed since review so you’re able to dudes appeared in the nearly half every interview and you may represented thirty-six per cent off the comments codifiedments themed as misogyny have been the majority comments (38 percent) and you will starred in 44 per cent of all interview. To phrase it differently, interviewees was really cognizant off Rousseff’s character just like the president in comparison to other male people in politics and you will former presidents, and also the implies Rousseff was punished through the their own government due to gendered presumption and you may backlash.
When you are looking with smaller regularity in the interview, the other several themes render extremely important context to help you insights you’ll be able to sexist backlash in presidency from Brazil’s earliest woman chairman. Conversations how Rousseff made an effort to follow gendered expectations ascribed in order to female (Complying to the Twice Bind) starred in more 10 percent of your own feedback coded and you may interview held. Meanwhile, talk about how Rousseff challenged new gendered expectations of their particular condition (Challenging the new Double Bind) starred in over you to 5th of all of the interview, constituting sixteen percent of all of the comments coded.
The latest description of the mathematical thickness of the thematic study brings a starting point so you can a qualitative analysis of every motif, concentrating on the partnership anywhere between per motif, especially the union involving the about three layouts individually pertaining to this new gendered double bind (analysis, complying, and you will tricky) and misogynistic backlash you to definitely followed.
Assessment in order to guys
Among subcategories known is reviews regarding Dilma Rousseff so you’re able to guys, both evaluating Rousseff so you’re able to male people in politics and you will discussing how things will be different if Rousseff was in fact men. Ergo, we found that there’s one another an abstract parts and simple aspect of their own evaluation to help you dudes. Inside the a conceptual sense, we quite often watched the term, “in the event that she were men” to spell it internationalwomen.net hans kommentar finns hГ¤r out how a situation might have starred out differently had Dilma perhaps not come a female. Brand new narrative depicted within interviews are away from a network that “favors dudes” (Respondent 88, ), with “zero unlock gender discrimination, although fact that [a politician] is actually a man are a bonus” (Respondent 8, ). Whenever sharing it review much more concretely, there clearly was a pay attention to Rousseff’s scratchy identity, the brand new “tough woman doing delicate guys.” This new quotation lower than will bring a whole lot more framework:
Discussions regarding the Rousseff’s impeachment in addition to sexism and misogyny at the rear of the brand new processes was talked about in the preferred media (Hao, 2016; Hertzman, 2016; Romero and you may Kaiser, 2016) plus scholarly work (Zdebskyi ainsi que al
Sure, plus they mentioned that she is actually a painful people, you to definitely she couldn’t communicate with some one, one to she got an enthusiastic authoritarian technique for speaking. Whatever for males appears as a praise “zero, he’s a difficult individual, a personal-confident individual that knows what he wants.” To their own are showed as negative “no, she doesn’t understand how to talk, she is tough, this woman is which” for the a bad method. The way they keep in touch with all of us, feminine. I have reached a particular condition, we’re getting harsh, the audience is deviating from to help you how to become a woman, who is sweet, transparent, silent and you may particularly. The form of Dilma getting ‘s the version of women that have the ability to getting good contained in this a totally patriarchal globe, against this purchase one to exists (Respondent 79, ).
